![]() ![]() We created a version of our index as an online survey that feeds us input in a more systematic way and as a means of reaching more people - you could, too, if your organizations are more accustomed to engaging in surveys online rather than in person. It can serve as the basis of a design visioning workshop with a larger group about how and where people work and how they would envision working in new ways in the future. There are a variety of ways you can use this exercise beyond one meeting. When you’re done, consider all your answers collectively - this can help give you the language to identify your needs beyond, say, “We need more collaborative meeting space.” Using the continuum below, try to identify the ideals for your particular situation (they will likely fall somewhere between the two extremes on either end). For the attribute “location,” for example, you could ask your team: Is the meeting best facilitated if it’s held in an in-demand central meeting room or near where other people are likely to gather? Or is it best facilitated closer to your team’s work area and away from where you are likely to encounter others? Pick an example of a work activity that happens regularly, like a daily or weekly standing meeting. ![]() To better understand how these work, try the exercise below on your own or with your team. To get everyone speaking the same spatial language, we created a Collaboration and Quiet index consisting of seven attributes that can more concretely enable people to match a desired way of working with a physical space: location, enclosure, exposure, technology, temporality, perspective, and size. It’s quite another to imagine what an alternative, effective scenario might look like. It’s one thing to note a person working solo in an otherwise empty seminar room, or a group of people huddling around someone’s desk because a conference room wasn’t available. The best way to identify these is to identify everyday work patters and micro-moments that correspond to office design decisions. In fact, collaboration and quiet are two ends of a continuum with a range of in-between work modes - each with an optimal setting. Increasingly, people are rediscovering the value of quiet and focus and asking for spaces where they can concentrate. Sometimes these designs work well however, research shows that this collaborative push may be too much of a good thing. An office environment reflects and reinforces a business’s core values, through the placement of different teams and functions and design elements that reflect culture, brand, and values.įor example, we’ve seen an explosion of open office layouts, in part because openness, transparency, and collaboration are some of the attributes companies strive for today. Smart companies understand that workspaces are a business tool. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |